🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's race for the White House, Donald Trump wooed voters with promises to reduce costs starting on day one. However, once he assumed office, there was precious little focus to affordability issues. This shifted following inflation-weary voters delivered a rebuke at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a hastily assembled campaign to tackle affordability. Unfortunately, the drive is a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours after the election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—who frequently associates with fellow billionaires—demonstrated a lack of empathy for millions of Americans facing difficulties when visiting the grocery store. In effect, he dismissed their concerns as trivial, suggesting they were mistaken about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” proved highly misleading and dishonest. How could every price be falling when the taxes he imposed were pushing up prices? Official statistics indicate banana prices rose nearly 7% in the last twelve months, the price of beef went up 14.7%, and coffee prices jumped 18.9%—partly because of import taxes applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, prices rose in five of the six food categories tracked by the government’s price index, such as animal proteins (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Statements

Despite the evidence, Trump continues to push his big lie about affordability. Since election day, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements ignore the fact that general costs have unarguably risen since Biden left office. At present, price growth is at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he claimed that fuel costs had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data show they are over three dollars.

Faced with reality and lower approval ratings, some Trump aides evidently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message made him sound dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many voters are angry about prices continuing to climb after promises of decreases. In response, advisers suggested one quick fix: reduce certain import taxes. This sensible idea contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Possible Effects

As certain taxes being rolled back on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will probably announce that he has lowered costs once those foods start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he ignited. In another instance, when addressing fast-food leaders, he declared that “we are in the peak period of America” and assured the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to countless households facing hardships—especially when millions risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a survey from October, three-quarters of respondents believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while only 26% rate them good or excellent. A separate survey found that a majority of citizens feel Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Reality and Proposed Steps

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, recently disputed assertions of a prosperous era. He stated that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “have contracted.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and shed around tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary called on the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to widespread concern about living costs, the president suggested a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” To numerous households in need, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea would likely raise government expenditure, increase borrowing costs, and possibly drive prices higher by putting more money into the economy.

A further supposed fix for affordability involved introducing half-century home loans, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. However, reality is that 50-year mortgages would do little to reduce installments—often reducing them by just $100 or $200 per month. The downside is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest borrowers pay and hinder their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Prospects

As part of their affordability campaign, the administration have once more blamed the previous president for financial challenges, including increasing costs. Officials stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are unfounded and inaccurate claims. In reality, the former president left a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. However, Trump’s policies—particularly import taxes—have created an economic mess, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

Per Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi worries that if key regions such as major economies tumble into recession, the nation could face a widespread recession. During recessions, people typically have less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, with Trump’s much-ballyhooed cost initiative probably ineffective to control costs, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might end up pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that struggling Americans really can’t afford.